IP checker
One verdict for any address: clean, caution or risky. We combine the network type, the Tor exit list, known VPN ranges, the Spamhaus DROP list and 8 DNS blocklists, and show every reason behind the result.
The address belongs to a datacenter or hosting range, not a home or mobile connection.
Verdict from the network type, the Tor exit list, Spamhaus DROP and eight DNS blocklists. Strict websites weigh the same signals.
Your IP β Look up another address
216.73.217.68
Datacenter / hosting- Datacenter / hosting rangeYes
- Tor exit nodeNo
- Known VPN / proxy providerNo
- Spamhaus DROPNo
- Blacklists0 / 8
Other representations
- Decimal
- 3628718404
- Hex
- 0xD849D944
- Binary
- 11011000.01001001.11011001.01000100
- Octal
- 0330.0111.0331.0104
- Arpa
- 68.217.73.216.in-addr.arpa
- Mapped
- ::ffff:216.73.217.68
DNS blocklists
0 of 8 listed- Spamhaus ZEN zen.spamhaus.orgNot checkedquery refused by list (resolver policy)
- SpamCop bl.spamcop.netNot listed
- Barracuda b.barracudacentral.orgNot listed
- SORBS dnsbl.sorbs.netNot listed
- UCEPROTECT L1 dnsbl-1.uceprotect.netNot listed
- PSBL psbl.surriel.comNot listed
- s5h.net all.s5h.netNot listed
- DroneBL dnsbl.dronebl.orgNot listed
How this check works
Paste an IPv4 or IPv6 address, or a hostname, and press check. Leave the box empty to check your own connection. The address goes through the same profile as the IP lookup, which gives us its location, its autonomous system and its network classification, and then through a round of checks that the lookup does not run by default:
- Tor exit list. We download the list of current Tor exit addresses from the Tor Project every day and match the address against it.
- Spamhaus DROP. The Don't Route Or Peer list names address ranges that Spamhaus considers hijacked or operated by criminal networks. It is small, updated daily on our side, and a match is decisive.
- Datacenter and VPN classification. The address is matched against a published list of datacenter ranges, and its network's name is compared with hosting and VPN provider keywords. This is the same classification you see on every page, and the result page shows which rule fired.
- 8 DNS blocklists. We send one query per list, reversing the address octets as the lists require, and read the answer code. Each list that returns a listing is shown with the reason it gives, for example an exploited host or a spam source. Results are cached for 1 hour.
The verdict is computed from those checks with fixed rules, printed below, so two people checking the same address at the same time get the same answer, and you can tell exactly which fact produced it.
How to read your result
| Verdict | Rule |
|---|---|
| Risky | The address is a Tor exit, or inside a Spamhaus DROP range, or listed on 2 or more of the 8 blocklists |
| Caution | None of the above, but the address is on a hosting or datacenter range, or its network is a known VPN or proxy provider, or it is listed on exactly 1 blocklist |
| Clean | None of the signals fired |
Private and reserved addresses, such as 192.168.1.1, are reported as clean with a note, because they are never routed on the internet and no list contains them.
Under the verdict you get the reasons as plain labels, the full blocklist table with one row per list, and the usual profile: location, network, prefix, hostname and classification. Read them together. A hosting address with no listings is a server that nobody has complained about, which is fine for a website and poor for a social login. A residential address with one listing is usually a home connection whose previous holder ran malware; it will pass most sites but may bounce at mail servers.
Two listings on a residential address deserve a closer look at the reasons. A listing from a policy list that marks whole dynamic ranges as "end-user, should not send mail directly" is not an accusation against you; it is the ISP's own statement that the range is for consumers. A listing from a list that records exploited hosts or active spam sources is an accusation, and strict sites treat it as one.
The 8 blocklists we query
| List | What a listing usually means |
|---|---|
| Spamhaus ZEN | Combined view of spam sources, exploited or infected hosts and policy-listed end-user ranges; the return code tells which |
| SpamCop | The address recently sent mail that recipients reported as spam |
| Barracuda | Poor sending reputation observed by Barracuda's mail filters |
| SORBS | Open relays, proxies, spam sources and dynamic ranges, depending on the sub-list |
| UCEPROTECT Level 1 | The individual address was caught sending spam or abuse to the project's traps |
| PSBL | The address delivered spam to a passive spam trap |
| s5h.net | Spam and abuse sources observed by the list operator |
| DroneBL | Compromised machines, open proxies and bot-controlled hosts, often used by IRC networks |
All 8 are queried over DNS, which is the way mail servers and signup forms consult them too. The Spamhaus lists refuse queries relayed through public resolvers, so they are asked from our own resolver; if that resolver is unavailable the row says so rather than reporting a false negative.
How to fix it
If the address is your own home or mobile connection:
- Read the reasons. A policy listing for a dynamic range needs no action. An exploited-host listing means a device on your network sent spam or scanned the internet; run a malware scan on every device, including phones, smart TVs and anything with a web interface.
- If your address is dynamic, restarting the router after a few minutes often gives you a different one, which sidesteps a listing left by a previous subscriber.
- For a listing you need removed, open the list's own page from the result table. Most lists remove an address automatically once the abuse stops, within a day to a few weeks; some offer a removal form.
If the address is a proxy or VPN exit you plan to use for logins:
- A caution verdict for hosting or VPN provider cannot be fixed on your side. Ask the provider for a residential or mobile pool, or choose a different exit, and check again.
- A caution verdict for a single blocklist on a residential address is often tolerable for web logins and not for email. Check what the listing says before discarding the address.
- A risky verdict means discard the address for anything that matters. Tor exits and DROP ranges are blocked at the edge by many services before any login page loads.
- When the verdict is clean, continue with the anonymity score from the browser profile you will use. The IP is only the first of the signals a strict site looks at.
If the address is a server you operate:
- Find the source of the listing: a compromised web application, a mail form without rate limits, a customer on a shared host, or an outbound scanner. Fix it first; delisting without a fix leads to a quick relisting.
- Set up a PTR record and valid SPF, DKIM and DMARC if the server sends mail, then request removal from each list through its own process.
- Re-check after an hour, when our cache expires, to confirm the removal propagated.
Limits of this check
- 8 lists are not every list. There are hundreds of DNS blocklists and many private reputation feeds. We query the 8 that are most widely consulted and free to query; a site using a commercial fraud database may know things we do not.
- Blocklists are IPv4 only here. Most DNSBLs do not publish IPv6 data, so IPv6 addresses are checked only against the Tor list, the DROP list and the classification rules.
- Classification is a heuristic. Hosting and VPN detection rely on a datacenter range list and keywords in the network name. Some hosting providers use neutral names and slip through; some consumer ISPs have a hosting arm under the same name and get flagged. The reasons are printed so you can judge.
- Lists change constantly and we cache for 1 hour. A listing or removal in the last hour may not show yet.
- A verdict is about the address, not the browser. Time zone mismatches, WebRTC leaks, DNS leaks and automation signals are scored separately by the proxy checker and the anonymity score.
- No reputation history of our own. We do not keep a record of what an address did last month; each check reads the public lists as they stand today.
Why is a clean IP still blocked by some sites?
Because the address is only one input. A site that challenges you after a clean verdict here is usually reacting to something else: a browser time zone that disagrees with the IP's country, a datacenter IP that our classifier missed but theirs caught, a commercial reputation score built from the address's behavior across many sites, cookies or device data left over from an earlier session, or the account's own history. Large platforms also rate addresses by how many distinct accounts have used them; a residential proxy address shared by many customers can be clean on every public list and still be rated poorly. The sequence that catches most of these before a login is: IP checker, then the anonymity score with the browser signals loaded, then the DNS leak test and WebRTC leak test, all from the same browser profile.
Checking an IP before you log in
The IP checker answers the first question in that sequence: is the address itself acceptable? Do it before you spend time on anything else, because no browser setting repairs a bad address. Aim for a clean verdict on a residential or mobile network in the country the account expects. Then look at the hostname on the result page; a PTR name that spells out a VPN or hosting brand is read by the same filters that read the lists. Finally, note the prefix size: a very small block announced by a non-ISP network is typical of leased ranges that get flagged as hosting even when the registry record says residential.
Checking a list of proxies
The form takes one address at a time, by design, since each check triggers 8 live DNS queries. For a batch, use the JSON API: request the lookup endpoint with the blacklists parameter and you receive the same classification, flags and blocklist summary as this page, 60 requests per minute without a key. The verdict rules above are deterministic, so you can reproduce them in your own script from the returned fields.
Questions people ask
What does it mean when an IP is clean?
The address is not a Tor exit, not inside a Spamhaus DROP range, not on any of the 8 blocklists we query, and its network is not classified as hosting or a VPN provider. It is the result a home or mobile connection normally gets.
Why is my IP marked caution?
Caution means exactly one soft signal fired: the network is a hosting range, the network name matches a VPN or proxy provider, or the address is listed on 1 blocklist. The reasons are printed under the verdict.
Why is my IP risky?
Risky is reserved for strong signals: the address is a Tor exit, it sits in a Spamhaus DROP range, or it is listed on 2 or more blocklists. Most services block or challenge such addresses outright.
Can a clean IP still be blocked by a website?
Yes. Sites also use their own history of an address, commercial reputation feeds we do not have, and browser signals such as time zone and WebRTC. A clean IP is necessary but not sufficient; the anonymity score covers the rest.
How do I get an IP off a blocklist?
Each list has its own removal page, linked in the result. Fix the cause first, because most lists re-add an address that keeps sending spam or scanning. Shared and dynamic addresses are often listed because of a previous user, in which case switching address is faster than delisting.
Does the check work for IPv6?
The network, Tor and classification checks work for IPv6. The blocklist queries are IPv4 only because the lists we use do not publish IPv6 data, so an IPv6 address can only reach clean or caution on those grounds.
Does checking an IP here get it listed anywhere?
No. The check only reads the public lists; it does not report anything to them. Results are cached for 1 hour so repeated checks of the same address do not hammer the list operators.
Why does an IP check show a different result than yesterday?
Blocklists add and remove addresses continuously, the Tor exit list is refreshed daily and our cache expires after an hour. A change usually means the address was listed or delisted in between.